Non-identity problem and the ethics of climate change Free Essay Example, 1250 words

At this point, we invite Barry’s notion of holding the generation to the habitual environment by their predecessors. As Barry articulates this principle, â€Å"A legitimate origin of different outcomes for different people is that they have made different voluntary choices. Some of these choices have bad outcomes and are responsible to provide a prima facie case for compensation. As a principle that applies to the concept of moral responsibility that provide a prima facie case for compensation. Collectively, Roberts believes as a principle that applies the concept of moral responsibility, there are issues of distributive justice which should be responded to 50. In this case, voluntary acts and choices determine the extent to which they might be held responsible for them, setting up several conceptual quandaries with significant implications for global climate policy. A close problem being noted is concerns of collective responsibility to entire nations for harm resulting from anthropogenic climate change. The normative sense of responsibility applied here requires moral agency that is typically on ly individual persons. Convincingly, different groups can be regarded as moral agents proactively. Reflectively, holding entire groups are responsible for the action of some members will violate the principle of responsibility. Drawing examples, it is objected that industrialized nations are responsible for climate change, which is merely shorthand for attributing responsibility to large groups of individual persons that collectively responsibility reduces to individual responsibility. We will write a custom essay sample on Non-identity problem and the ethics of climate change or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Reflectively, Woollard believes that the attribution of responsibility might reference national culture or policy that is innately collective products rather than the sort of thing that can be attributed to individual separately 690. Rightly, the global regime must allocate emissions caps to nations themselves, which are not too particular individuals to assess liability at the national rather than individual level. In most cases, the predicted impacts of climate change involve ecosystem disruptions, economic instability, political and heightened social and international conflicts. The permeable question, in this case, concerns the legal responsibility of the same. Given that climate change must hold parties liable for climate-related harm, it is important to construct a fair and effective climate regime which requires the beginning with a philosophical account for responsibility in order to ensure that legal attributions of responsibility are prope rly understood.